🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios launched a fresh game mode called Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option mirrors the standard Breakthrough format but includes several notable adjustments:

• Each team includes only eight real players, with the rest filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by real players award complete experience points, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Just a pair of locations are available: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, accolades, and career stat updates have been turned off.

In short, this mode delivers on its title: it's a casual version of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think it's a good idea, since it gives additional choices for players seeking different methods to enjoy the title. But, if video games has shown one thing, it is that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, many BF6 players are upset.

Player Responses: Anger to Praise

"Gamers prefer real players. Don't repeat the errors of your rivals," states one reply to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," says a different user. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are headed with this game," and someone else lists everything they believe to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, real players keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," says one Reddit comment. "The community fails to see that there are players who have lives and can't play this game all the time. Let them find a middle ground," adds a different comment. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is great for me," and another applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Criticisms and Player Input

All that said, there are valid points to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it will make queue times more extended for different playlists because of the sheer number of options currently available. On a similar note, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears a little backwards that the mode won't start without a required amount of real players, despite it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer full XP, even against bots, but that got canned when they tried to eliminate bot farms from the system. So Casual Breakthrough feels like the community meeting them halfway, according to forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced so much fun in the initial release, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Be Made?

Should the development team has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and responding to player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, just like the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, if their data shows this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to change it again.